[img_assist|nid=61|title=Michael Veenstra|desc=Michael Veenstra speaks to city council's economic development and planning committee on Tuesday.|link=node|align=right|width=500|height=332]Sometimes you have to work at finding an excuse to punt an unpleasant chore down the road. At other times, the excuse just presents itself.
City councillors did not have to find any justifications, this time around, for their latest delay of the development charges debate.
In December, they put off the difficult decision on whether or not to reinstate the fees to builders by arguing developers needed more time to study the issue.
This time, the reason was the requisite consultant's report, the quote for which has gone stale.
There's no disputing we need a fresh quote, since the Hemson Consulting proposal is based on 2010 figures. The question should be why the city didn't suggest getting the fresh quotes in December, knowing we'd have to have the debate anyway.