[img_assist|nid=43|title=Black and Decker site|desc=|link=none|align=right|width=400|height=242]

The award for non-sequitur comment of the weekend goes to "the_moment," for: "If you all think a bird should be in the front of your home town paper that is why all the jobs in Brockville are flying south."

Someone please tell me the connection. And besides, our story on the passing of the parrot (which, thankfully, some people "got" and expressed the appropriate sympathy) was not on the front page, but on page three.

One front-page story had to do with jobs that may not be flying south (or east, for that matter).

The sale of the former Black and Decker property is far from a done deal. Court-ordered sales can be even more complicated than ordinary ones, so we'll have to wait until May to find out where this goes.

Anything on that site, be it retail, warehousing or a secret farm for breeding parrots, would be better than what's there now. Camalor needs neighbours.

[img_assist|nid=13|title=|desc=|link=none|align=right|width=600|height=400]There's something sadly symbolic about the looming closure of the Data Group plant in Brockville. The plant makes stock tab computer paper, the kind with holes in the margins that go on those old printer sprockets, as well as cash register rolls.

Computer printers with sprockets. Kind of sounds as obsolete as the old pre-globalization and early-globalization manufacturing model under which Brockville thrived, the disappearance of which has created the economic mess we are in right now. ("It is sad to watch Brockville circle the drain," one of the commenters under the story remarks.)

The parallel is obvious: obsolete product; obsolete city.

It is also more than a little too simple.

The Data Group closing won't be the last one to hit Brockville, and as the city transforms under a new economic model, it likely won't be a Fortune 500 town again.

But there will be something here. What that will be will depend on what is possible.

[img_assist|nid=40|title=Use-of-force training|desc=Reporter Ronald Zajac, left, tries to pacify Const. Shawn Borgford during a scenario in Tuesday's use-of-force training.|link=none|align=none|width=900|height=596]

As you can now read in today's R&T, Brockville could get an OPP costing, should it ask for one, as early as this summer, as long as all the bureaucratic and statistical stars align.

And if next Tuesday's vote proves to be a "Yes," Pembroke and Orillia could well be two poster cities for, respectively, the pro-OPP and and pro-city-police sides of this debate.

This morning, however, I have a different policing exprience in mind.

I am actually quite proud of the way I held my own in yesterday's city police use-of-force training exercise. Still, one look at the video will reveal that I would not have gone far in this scenario without the timely instructions of Det.-Const. Graham Coe.

[img_assist|nid=36|title=Louise Severson|desc=Former councillor Louise Severson speaks to city council's finance, administration and operations committee last Wednesday.|link=none|align=right|width=350|height=312]In the news business, it's always a risk to promise.

When I promised, yesterday, there would be more coverage of Brockville's OPP costing debate in today's print edition, it was before a much more important story, the Boston Marathon tragedy, had happened.

Today we pray for Boston, and tomorrow (one hopes), we can return to the debates that fill our regular civic space, albeit with a renewed sense of perspective.

In the meantime, I see former Councillor and COPS chairwoman Louise Severson has taken to Facebook to deny, yet again, any intentions of running for mayor -- or at least, as she noted here, of running with policing as her platform -- in next year's municipal election.

To be clear, my opinion to the contrary, in Friday's column, was just that: an opinion, based on my reading of the political math and the political momentum.

[img_assist|nid=18|title=Policing debate|desc=|link=none|align=middle|width=1000|height=209]

Should the city and Ontario Provincial Police bureaucracies decide to work well together in the event of a council "Yes" vote on an OPP costing request, I may end up with egg to remove from my face. (Keep it sunny-side up, please, and do pay attention to those shell fragments...)

My post-FAO opining about the likely outcome of the crucial April 23 council vote included some significant electoral implications. That was based on the assumption that, out of the typical estimate of 18 months to two years to turn a city from municipal policing to OPP, the lion's share of that time would be spent getting a figure that is palatable to the city, while less time would be needed for the powers above to approve any badge change.

Getting that number late would put the whole decision whether or not to switch badges into the 2014 election season.

[img_assist|nid=36|title=Louise Severson|desc=Former councillor Louise Severson speaks to city council's finance, administration and operations committee on Wednesday.|link=none|align=right|width=500|height=446]

As I point out in my column on Wednesday's OPP costing decision, I now believe my previous post on this subject will turn out to be only half right.

[img_assist|nid=34|title=OPP costing debate|desc=Police Chief John Gardiner, right, speaks to OPP Sgt. Paul Legault, while OPP Supt. Carson Pardy, centre, looks on during the April 10 finance, administration and operations committee meeting.|link=none|align=middle|width=900|height=591]

I believe it was the late, great Recorder and Times scribe Harry Painting who once famously said: "Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story."

[img_assist|nid=18|title=OPP costing?|desc=|link=none|align=middle|width=900|height=188]

I'm not sure what my record is for predictions, but here's how I think Wednesday's debate on the OPP costing will go.

You can say what you want about Brockville's budget, and there's usually plenty to say, but at least your criticisms and complaints have to do with the content of the budget, and not its disclosure -- or lack thereof.

In a decade or so covering city council, I have never had to fight for access to city budget details. In fact, I recall sitting at a table in the Victoria Building with three very patient women, each of them in charge of a different section of the budget, hashing out how to add up operating, capital, water and sewer to come up with a comprehensive total expenditures figure.

There are plenty more details in Brockville's budget than in a smaller municipality like, say, Front of Yonge. So it was more than a little surprising to hear my colleague, Alanah Duffy, tell me staff and elected officials there were telling her to wait a week for the details of a 3.7-per-cent levy increase last night. And this, after third reading -- that is to say, after the budget is done and adopted.

Supporters of a twin-pad arena in Brockville may be alarmed at the sight of Councillor Jason Baker's motion crossed out of Tuesday night's agenda. No need to panic, the explanation for the motion's deferral is a little higher up, under delegations.